miércoles, 10 de mayo de 2017

The peril in the Pill: How birth control changed everything. | MercatorNet | May 10, 2017 |

The peril in the Pill: How birth control changed everything.

| MercatorNet | May 10, 2017 |







The peril in the Pill

How birth control changed everything, but not necessarily for the better.
Nicole M. King | May 10 2017 | comment 1 



The News Story:
In a series entitled “50 Years Ago This Week,” TIME magazine investigates its headlines of the same dates a half-century ago. Earlier this month, the publication focused on the cover story of the week of April 7, 1967—featuring the wonders of the birth control pill.
In fewer than ten years on the market, the oral contraceptive had, the 1967 cover story asserted, “changed and liberated the sex and family life of a large and still growing segment of the U.S. population.” This miracle drug was poised to address overpopulation concerns rampant during the time, and so “go far toward eliminating hunger, want and ignorance.” TIME believes that “the story reflects a moment in time when concern over population control and the rise of women in the workforce converged with the available science to provide the right solution at the right time.” 
But 50 years later, research is shedding light on some of the more unpleasant side effects of hormonal contraceptives, research that may indicate that “the right solution at the right time” may have been not so right, after all. 
(Sources: Lily Rothman, “50 Years Ago This Week: How Birth Control Changed Everything,” TIME, April 3, 2017.)
The New Research: The Peril in the Pill
Almost six decades after the FDA approved the Pill—the oral contraceptive—progressives are still proclaiming its liberating virtues loudly. Perhaps they feel compelled to speak loudly in order to drown out the sobering reports on the harmful side effects of their chemical emancipator. Still, those reports do keep drifting in. This latest report—published by researchers at Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences in Iran—concludes that women who use the Pill face a risk of breast cancer more than half again higher than that faced by women who do not.
The authors of the new study decided to investigate the relationship between oral contraceptives and breast cancer for two compelling reasons. First, breast cancer is currently among the most common causes of death among women: worldwide, about one and a half million women are diagnosed with the disease each year, and nearly half a million die as its victims. Worse, discernible trends in available evidence indicate that “the next 20 years will witness considerable increase in incidence of the disease.”  Though the disease strikes women in all lands, epidemiologists find a “high incidence . . . [of the disease] in more developed countries and low incidence in undeveloped countries.” 
Given that women in economically developed countries use the Pill much more than women in undeveloped countries, it is not surprising that some researchers have hypothetically identified oral contraceptives as carcinogens. But the studies on the matter to date have returned inconsistent results: “Some findings have shown that taking these pills does not have a significant effect in increasing the risk of breast cancer,” the authors of the new study remark, “while others have confirmed the carcinogenic effect of these products.” Themselves located in a fast-modernizing country where the incidence of breast cancer “is expected to increase drastically . . . over the next decades,” the authors of the new study consider it a matter of some urgency to resolve the ambiguity in the “contradictory findings” on the linkage between oral contraceptives and breast cancer.
As a meta-analysis, this new Iranian study actually draws together and summarizes the results of 26 studies, all published between 2000 and 2015. A total of 46,260 Iranian women were involved in these studies, 24 of which were case-control studies, while 2 were population-based studies. 
After careful analysis, the authors of the new study calculate that, collectively, the 26 studies yield an “Overall estimate of O[dds]R[atio] for the effect of oral contraceptive pills on breast cancer [as] 1.521 (CI = 1.25–1.85).” In other words, these studies reveal that among Iranian women, “using [contraceptive] pills increased the risk of breast cancer . . . 1.52 times.” 
In explaining their findings, the Kermanshah scholars reason that oral contraceptives—“mainly composed of estrogen and progesterone”—may cause breast cancer directly by artificially increasing estrogen levels in the body. The researchers further argue that since elevated estrogen levels are associated with weight gain and since a number of studies have limned “a relationship between obesity and breast cancer,” use of oral contraceptives “directly leads to overweight and indirectly to breast cancer.” 
Regardless of how contraceptives expose women to increased risk of breast cancer, the researchers worry about the magnitude of that risk, so much so that they believe “more studies should be conducted for controlling the period of pill use.” 
But this study would seem to indicate that the safest “period of pill use” is no period at all.
(Source: Bryce Christensen and Nicole M. King, forthcoming in “New Research,” The Natural Family. Study: Ali Soroush et al., “The Role of Oral Contraceptive Pills on Increased Risk of Breast Cancer in Iranian Populations: A Meta-analysis,” Journal of Cancer Prevention 21.4 [2016]: 294-301.)
Nicole M. King is the Managing Editor of The Family in America. Republished from The Family in America, a MercatorNet partner site, with permission.
- See more at: https://www.mercatornet.com/family_edge/view/the-peril-in-the-pill/19776#sthash.k0Oerxc6.dpuf



MercatorNet

May 10, 2017

If I were invited to attend a two-day seminar which had been praised as “transformative, powerful and life changing”, a significant commitment of time”, but one which “will have great dividends for our community,” I would refuse to go. I associate words like “transformative, powerful and life changing” with endless hours of waffle.
Great minds think alike. Duke University professor Paul Griffiths was invited to a seminar on racism which promised all this and more. He responded that it sounded “intellectually flaccid”, potentially totalitarian and a waste of time. That was three months ago. This week he was forced to resign.
What is going on in America’s great universities? Denyse O’Leary explains below.


Michael Cook
Editor
MERCATORNET



West ignores Indonesia’s slide toward Islamic extremism
By Michael Cook
The Christian governor or Jakarta has been jailed for blasphemy against the Qur'an
Read the full article
 
 
When professors stifle freedom of thought
By Denyse O'Leary
In some universities, academics are waging a flat-out war on reality
Read the full article
 
 
The peril in the Pill
By Nicole M. King
How birth control changed everything, but not necessarily for the better.
Read the full article
 
 
The false promise of digital storage for posterity
By Karl D. Stephan
From Aristotle to Hollywood: we can't keep everything forever.
Read the full article
 
 
Captive Maiden: wrong sort of romance
By Theresa Fagan
Another look at a young adult novel
Read the full article
 
 
Christians in the Middle East: a guide
By Martino Diez
It is not easy to navigate among the ancient Christian communities in the Middle East
Read the full article
 
 
New Swiss Guards swear to defend the Pope with their lives
By Carolyn Moynihan
After 500 years Swiss Catholic families still provide bodyguards for the Holy Father.
Read the full article
 
 
Is Trump’s executive order “religious nothingness”?
By Sheila Liaugminas
The President is disappointing supporters by his lack of clarity in relieving the burden of the HHS mandate
Read the full article
 
 
British consulates host same-sex weddings in Australia that are invalid there
By Colin Hart
They are interfering in the democratic process.
Read the full article
 
 
Exposing the dark side of egg donation
By Philippa Taylor
Does the health and well being of women count for nothing? Where are the feminists standing up for them? Where are the regulators?
Read the full article
 
 
10 demographic trends shaping our lives
By Shannon Roberts
Has your world changed?
Read the full article


MERCATORNET | New Media Foundation
Suite 12A, Level 2, 5 George Street, North Strathfied NSW 2137, Australia

Designed by elleston

New Media Foundation | Suite 12A, Level 2, 5 George St | North Strathfield NSW 2137 | AUSTRALIA | +61 2 8005 8605 

No hay comentarios: