jueves, 24 de agosto de 2017

Toxic identity politics ‘in these tribal times’ | August 24, 2017 | MercatorNet |

Toxic identity politics ‘in these tribal times’
August 24, 2017 | MercatorNet  | 

Toxic identity politics ‘in these tribal times’

Is what unites us still stronger than what divides us?
Sheila Liaugminas | Aug 24 2017 | comment 1 


Where and how America is divided is far more evident these days than where and how we're united, given the still growing public tensions over symbols, words, gestures and fundamental identities. And media coverage amplifying the worst of it all.
The 'poison of identity politics' is not new, says a Wall Street Journal editorial:
The politics of white supremacy was a poison on the right for many decades, but the civil-rights movement rose to overcome it, and it finally did so in the mid-1960s with Martin Luther King Jr. ’s language of equal opportunity and color-blind justice.
That principle has since been abandoned, however, in favor of a new identity politics that again seeks to divide Americans by race, ethnicity, gender and even religion. “Diversity” is now the all-purpose justification for these divisions, and the irony is that America is more diverse and tolerant than ever.
The problem is that the identity obsessives want to boil down everything in American life to these categories. In practice this means allocating political power, contracts, jobs and now even salaries in the private economy based on the politics of skin color or gender rather than merit or performance. Down this road lies crude political tribalism, and James Damore’s recent Google dissent is best understood as a cri de coeur that we should aspire to something better. Yet he lost his job merely for raising the issue.
A politics fixated on indelible differences will inevitably lead to resentments that extremists can exploit in ugly ways on the right and left. The extremists were on the right in Charlottesville, but there have been examples on the left in Berkeley, Oakland and numerous college campuses. When Democratic politicians can’t even say “all lives matter” without being denounced as bigots, American politics has a problem.
Rod Dreher addressed this in a sobering look at opposing evils.
Looking and listening to the neo-Nazis and right-wing radicals at the march is not the same as reading about them. Evil has a face, and a voice, and it is chilling....
But let's not "excuse or diminish the real threat to our politics from the violent left-wing agitators of antifa (anti-fascists). You may be tempted to sympathize with them because they punch neo-Nazis..."
But not so fast, or reactionary, Dreher cautions
For a while, antifa has remained on the fringes of the Left, smashing up storefronts to protest globalism, and things like that...
And then, the money quote:
The legitimization by mainstream people of violent political action is a Rubicon. Mark my words, it will be followed by the same thing on the Right.
So here we are. And Dreher asks the big question core:
Where are the restraining forces against radicalization on both the Left and the Right?
Exactly. Lately, on radio and elsewhere in conversations, I've been calling for voices of authority on both center-left and center-right (or whoever could be a moderating force) to call out the fringes on both sides. But they aren't on the same side, and conservatives have asked media to stop calling white supremacists and neo-Nazis 'far right conservatives', since they don't share conservative values and principles.
Who speaks for America right now? With the ability to amplify one's own voice through social media platforms and unprecedented access to the arena of ideas, the people have to speak up and speak out.
Dreher says:
The media should talk about every instance of people on the Left and the Right, especially authority figures (pastors, politicians, academics, and so on) legitimizing violence as a way to solve political disputes. And the rest of us should fight hard to make it taboo, to establish it as a line we as a society will not cross. We have to stop with whataboutism, the habit of responding to revolting things your own side does with “but the other side does it too!”
That's a point for an examination of conscience for all the people who take recourse to that explanation for the 'slingshot' effect of unrest from devolving into 1968 type of riots and demonstrations, says Dreher,
...it is time for people in authority — whatever authority they have — to speak out forcefully and repeatedly. Not just people on the Right, but people on the Left. If we are going to stop this spiral into political violence, we have to start somewhere. It doesn’t matter who’s worse, antifa or the neo-Nazis. Both are capable of doing severe damage to our democracy, because they both hate the political order, and they both love violence.
Denounce it, all of it, civilly and with the counter love of people, community, the common good, human rights and dignity, freedom and justice for all.
Which sounds a lot like Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.'s rousing talk 'Our God Is Marching On!' in 1965.
If the worst in American life lurked in its dark streets, the best of American instincts arose passionately from across the nation to overcome it. There never was a moment in American history more honorable and more inspiring than the pilgrimage of clergymen and laymen of every race and faith pouring into Selma to face danger...
For fellow countrymen.
The confrontation of good and evil compressed in the tiny community of Selma generated the massive power to turn the whole nation on a new course.
We need to redirect ourselves there now.
MercatorNet

August 24, 2017

A news story from The Telegraph in my local paper this morning informed me that I should not take the Gospels literally. This is because a 1500 year old manuscript has been discovered that adds "weight to the idea that many early scholars did not see the Bible as a history, but as a series of coded messages on key elements of Christianity."

What ho! -- another Da Vinci Code exposé? No, just a very old commentary on the Gospels that draws spiritual lessons from the accounts of what Jesus really said and did -- as Christians have done throughout the ages. The fact that one can read them as allegories of Christian life does not mean they are only made up stories, of course. Read the article by Hugh Houghton, who did the English translation, for a sober account of this interesting new development.










Carolyn Moynihan
Deputy Editor,
MERCATORNET
Post CommentsFind Us on FacebookFollow us on Twitter
Rediscovered: lost Latin commentary on the Gospels
By Hugh Houghton
Digital technology helps identify the 1,500 year old text.
Read the full article
Toxic identity politics ‘in these tribal times’
By Sheila Liaugminas
Is what unites us still stronger than what divides us?
Read the full article
Why only children are at higher risk of obesity
By Nicole M. King
Weighing the best outcomes for our kid(s).
Read the full article
After Isis, Pakistan listed as major offender in US religious freedom report
By Kristin Wright
But ten others are also 'countries of particular concern'.
Read the full article
What to do with Confederate statues?
By James Glaser
Could Russia teach America something about how to deal with difficult aspects of its history?
Read the full article
Modern day slavery part II
By Marcus Roberts
It's widespread, but where is it mostly occurring?
Read the full article
Don’t panic over teen pregnancy prevention cuts
By Helen M. Alvaré
It was the Obama administration that found they weren't working.
Read the full article
The left is way more dangerous than loony white supremacists
By Jules Gomes
The orchestrated violence of the last couple of years is almost exclusively from the left.
Read the full article
Dutch couple choose euthanasia together
By Michael Cook
It's an increasingly common practice in the Netherlands, it seems
Read the full article




MERCATORNET | New Media Foundation 

Suite 12A, Level 2, 5 George Street, North Strathfied NSW 2137, Australia 

Designed by elleston

No hay comentarios: